osCommerce-Official 206 Posted March 11, 2021 1 hour ago, Hotclutch said: On the dev site, rel="canonical" is being used incorrectly. <link href='https://dev.trueloaded.co.uk/men-s' rel='canonical' /> is not the canonical of: https://dev.trueloaded.co.uk/men-s?page=2&sort=pd If this is a module of V4 then it ought not to be configured in the on state. Google won't accept this choice of canonical, and if it did it will cause product pages to be starved of link equity and drop them out of the index. Thanks for this comment, will pass this to the development team @Sergey Dunaev @VladMal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
osCommerce-Official 206 Posted March 17, 2021 On 3/11/2021 at 5:00 PM, Hotclutch said: On the dev site, rel="canonical" is being used incorrectly. <link href='https://dev.trueloaded.co.uk/men-s' rel='canonical' /> is not the canonical of: https://dev.trueloaded.co.uk/men-s?page=2&sort=pd If this is a module of V4 then it ought not to be configured in the on state. Google won't accept this choice of canonical, and if it did it will cause product pages to be starved of link equity and drop them out of the index. Ashley, we have checked the situation with canonical with an SEO / PPC expert and also used SEMRUSH to scan a demo website. Happy to say that no issues or errors were reported. Would be happy to discuss this issue with you further, to ensure nothing stops osCommerce websites from achieving top positions in Google Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hotclutch 191 Posted March 17, 2021 Your SEO expert is wrong on this one. There's no scan you can run that will generate errors. If you configure like this, Google will reject your choice of canonical, and place instead what it believes to be the canonical. Anyone with access to webmaster tools on a live site will be able to confirm this with the inspection tool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hotclutch 191 Posted March 17, 2021 This video is old but still contains useful information, also i have heard that rel="next", rel="prev" has been deprecated, but not 100% sure on that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hotclutch 191 Posted March 17, 2021 https://searchengineland.com/google-no-longer-supports-relnext-prev-314319 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
osCommerce-Official 206 Posted March 17, 2021 3 hours ago, Hotclutch said: Thanks will watch it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alfredor 0 Posted June 7, 2021 Hello, For multi-language sites, it is contemplated to write the URL tags in different languages of the same product, category or index: link rel = "alternate" hreflang = "XX" <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr" href="https://www.xxx.com/fr/xxx.html" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="it" href="https://www.xxx.com/it/xxx.html" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="en" href="https://www.xxx.com/en/xxx.html" /> Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
loveitall 0 Posted June 15, 2021 (edited) I want to ask will there be BCC email section, as trustpilot verified reviews it can only be verified if the we put the link from trustpilot into the BCC section. Also when are you planning to launch the new version? Edited June 15, 2021 by loveitall Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aisonet 0 Posted September 21, 2021 I would like the ability to exclude certain content pages/categories/products from the xml sitemap. Maybe add that to the SEO tab (exclude from sitemap) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aisonet 0 Posted November 11, 2021 On 9/21/2021 at 9:39 AM, aisonet said: I would like the ability to exclude certain content pages/categories/products from the xml sitemap. Maybe add that to the SEO tab (exclude from sitemap) This is useful when you dont want the search engines to know about specific products or pages Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aisonet 0 Posted December 16, 2021 Other SEO features (per google lighthouse) I hope to see with OSC 4 are: 1. Compressed/optimized images (if possible, webp would be great) 2. Lazy loading images 3. Responsive images (different sizes from each image to serve on different devices) 4. Webfont preloading ( By optimizing rendering cycles, Chrome 83 eliminates layout shifting when preloading optional fonts. Modern browsers allow you to eliminate layout shifting entirely by preloading optional fonts - combining <link rel="preload"> with font-display: optional. This requires a developer working closely with the code, and a diagnostic tool like Lighthouse, to optimize webfont delivery." https://web.dev/preload-optional-fonts/) along with ensuring text remains visible during webfont loading. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
♥Gyakutsuki 150 Posted February 26 Hello @aisonet 1. compressed/optimized images (if possible, webp would be great) ====> Yes 2. Lazy loading images ===> yes it's inside 3. Responsive images (different sizes from each image to serve on different devices) ====> Yes Some more informations can give to you by the developer 2 osCommerce-Official and aisonet reacted to this Regards ----------------------------------------- Loïc Contact me by skype for business Contact me @gyakutsuki for an answer on the forum Share this post Link to post Share on other sites