Hotclutch

Check your configure files - there's 2 of them - one on the catalog side and one one the admin side. See if you can correct the paths there.

if ( tep_session_is_registered('customer_id') ) { log off link } else { my account link }

the breadcrumb is an ordered list, it outputs like <ol class="breadcrumb"> <li>...</li> <li>...</li> </ol> Your myaccount link is a <li> in the list, and looks like <li><a href="myaccount"></li>. The problem is to float that link right, you will have to introduce code or CSS to target just that one <li> in the list. So the question is does it have to be in the breadcrumb trail, or can it be above or below it, because that will be easy to achieve.

Yes there are people with knowledge of BS4. The main advantage of BS4 over BS3 is the incorporation of flexbox. I don't see a lot of that being used in the template on the demo site. Plus overall, BS4 is a much refined framework compared to BS3.

How come the last post link works intermittently (for me at least.) ? Clicking on the last post link on the forum home pages used to take you to the last post in the thread, now it goes straight to the first page of the thread - or does it not work like that anymore.

Thanks.

Can someone PM me the link as well ?

Those are the parameters of the tep_image function as found in the html_output.php //// // The HTML image wrapper function function tep_image($src, $alt = '', $width = '', $height = '', $parameters = '', $responsive = true, $bootstrap_css = '') { if ( (empty($src) || ($src == 'images/')) && (IMAGE_REQUIRED == 'false') ) { return false; }

that may be the reason for you redirects. you don't put that code in admin htaccess - it goes in the catalog side htaccess.

It's ok if the OP wants sliders Actually the most disturbing thing was the price of that jigsaw - did not want to say at first - glad that's been clarified.

Congratulations on what you have achieved thus far. I have to agree with the above poster, i think the sliders are a bit too much. On the large screen and xl screens the left column content appears squashed.

it's very difficult to plan layout this way with the way osCommerce is now. The reason the image falls below the description is because of the sort order you have set on the product_info modules, and everything goes into a single row. It's very limiting. BS3 uses push pull classes which are now deprecated in BS4 where ordering is easier. I don't remember if you can do push/pull for different breakpoints eg. push-sm-*, but that's probably your only options.

^^Bootstrap has lots of utilities for this - even more so now with BS4. You can give us an example of what layout you mean, or if you mean the above layout, then how do you want it to look on a small screen?

The core code needs to be improved. Just like there is an option to have a 1/2/3 column layout overall, so there can be an option to have 1/2/3 columns on the product page. Then for each product_info module, there will be a configurable option of which column you want to insert the module into.

Nowhere does it say in your article that URLs are no longer a ranking factor. Besides being a ranking factor or not, there are technical reasons to install this addon, besides the common sense reason of wanting human readable URLs. This addon won't bring you traffic, just like "breadcrumb schema baked into the core" won't bring you traffic. We all know what brings traffic.