Jump to content
Latest News: (loading..)

safoo

Members
  • Content count

    485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Real Name
    Safoo
  1. safoo

    msv 1.0

    Sean, You need to go through your instructions again. This is basic stuff. You are missing a define for TABLE_VENDORS in includes/database_tables.php
  2. safoo

    ULTIMATE SEO Issue

    You need to check your cookie settings. search on the forums or knowledge base regarding what the proper settings should be.
  3. Are you talking about fast easy checkout? From what I understand the no-account feature is optional. You can require an account and have payment and shipping on one page.
  4. safoo

    Coverting carts to order

    Someone just posted a contribution for that today: http://www.oscommerce.com/community/contributions,4763 It is too much work though! Why don't you try installing the oscommerce paypal ipn module. Installation is simple and the only real work is entering the configuration values for the module (such as your email address etc.) http://www.oscommerce.com/community/contri...l/search,paypal
  5. safoo

    msv 1.0

    did you check your database if vendor_configuration table exists? MVS should have an sql file that you need to run to create the new tables.
  6. That site seems to be using a custom mod to show the prices. But to use products as attributes, try 'master products' contribution.
  7. safoo

    Multi_Vendor_Shipping new thread

    What about the other 2 settings. package tare weight and percentage increase.
  8. safoo

    Multi_Vendor_Shipping new thread

    What is your setting in admin for configuration -> shipping/packaging -> 'enter maximum package weight' ? If you set it to, for example, 30 pounds and the total shopping cart weight is 45 pounds, then OSC gets a quote for 2 packages, 1 at 30 pounds and 1 at 15 pounds. I'm guessing that is why your UPS rates show two packages.
  9. safoo

    Customer order without my input?

    are you only using one distributor? If so, you can set the 'send extra order emails' to your distributor. Otherwise, you can try MVS but be careful because it is a large package to install.
  10. negativerad, Are you using a real credit card or one of the test card numbers? Try putting osc and authorize.net in live mode and use a real credit card (your own). Sometimes the test card numbers don't quite work.
  11. safoo

    Tep Get Tax Contrib

    Just comment out the complete old function and add the new functions. Yes, the functions look completely different; this is because these functions will get information from the new tax class and most of the code that you don't see is in the class definition.
  12. safoo

    authorize net and Drop down Credit card type

    You would have to compare the authorize.net aim file with one of the other credit card modules that does have the drop down and then copy and paste some PHP code. To tell you the truth its not really necessary. If you want to list the credit cards you accept, take a look at this contribution: http://www.oscommerce.com/community/contri.../search,cc_show
  13. safoo

    Multi-Vendor Shipping sql error

    Double check your database.php additions. There should be a define for "TABLE_VENDOR_CONFIGURATION". If you look in the file, you will know what I mean. Any time you have an error similar to this one, OSC is missing the definition for that place holder. In this case: TABLE_VENDOR_CONFIGURATION Also, this should have been posted in the MVS thread.
  14. did you login to your authorize.net account and make sure you are not in test mode on authorize.net's end? also, this should have been posted in one of the authorize.net threads.
  15. safoo

    USPS (SSL) Implemented for Web Tool APIs

    Yes I think Bob is correct. I did receive a "4th email", though it is the first I have received. USPS Methods uses ExpressMailRequest and PriorityMailRequest, which will not requires HTTPS integration according to the email. USPS Methods doesn't send any sensitive, private information except zip code, which is why I believe they will not require this new implementation.
×