Jump to content



Latest News: (loading..)

- - - - -

Are we all going to get sued?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
8 replies to this topic

#1   Shawn

Shawn
  • Members
  • 98 posts

Posted 21 October 2002 - 05:56 PM

These guys are trying to sued everyone that can get their hands on for using E-Commerce techniques..(Not Technologies)

Chek out this link:

http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20...1020S0002[/url]

Here is a link to also check out...In our defense!

http://www.youmaybenext.com/

Has this happended to anyone here yet?

Shawn

#2   mattice

mattice
  • Members
  • 2,637 posts

Posted 22 October 2002 - 08:15 AM

Didn't Amazon tried something similar once as well?
"Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them"

#3   Jan0815

Jan0815
  • Members
  • 617 posts

Posted 22 October 2002 - 08:22 AM

You can read the story now on slashdot.

This is just another example of patents gone mad.

Fortunately these patents are not valid in Europe ;-)

I can only advise our american users to get in contact with the EFF and join forces to stop this ridiculous stuff. BTW - there is prior art here. Ask google for minivend ;-)

HTH
You can't have everything. That's why trains have difficulty crossing oceans, and hippos did not adapt to fly. -- from the OpenBSD mailinglist.

#4   Jan0815

Jan0815
  • Members
  • 617 posts

Posted 22 October 2002 - 08:31 AM

OK, I will help you with your search ;-)

From: http://carnagepro.com/pub/Docs/MiniVend/

Quote

About Vend, MiniVend's ancestor

Vend was written by Andrew Wilcox in the early part of 1995, and the first released (beta) version was 0.2. Vend 0.2 is the parent of MiniVend, and the first version of MiniVend (called Vend 0.2m7) was totally based on that. It added searching and DBM catalog storage. Subsequent versions took parts from Vend 0.3, especially the VLINK and Server.pm modules, which were adapted to run with MiniVend.

The first release of MiniVend (0.2m7) was on December 28, 1995, making it over four years old. A veritable eon in web time!

IANAL - but this can be considered prior art, making the patents obsolete. I would ask the EFF or the FSF about this.
You can't have everything. That's why trains have difficulty crossing oceans, and hippos did not adapt to fly. -- from the OpenBSD mailinglist.

#5   Salvo

Salvo
  • Members
  • 1,008 posts

Posted 22 October 2002 - 08:56 AM

Quote

These guys are trying to sued everyone that can get their hands on for using E-Commerce techniques..(Not Technologies)

Chek out this link:

http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20...1020S0002[/url]

Here is a link to also check out...In our defense!

http://www.youmaybenext.com/

Has this happended to anyone here yet?

Shawn

I don't understand what that means...

being sued for selling over the net using osc? or selling a specific product using osc?
or what else?
Sal

PS: Europe is not affected I presume...

#6   Paul_C

Paul_C
  • Members
  • 249 posts

Posted 22 October 2002 - 09:14 AM

[rant]
Welcome to the American "Free Market" system. (For other misnomers also see America's "Free Media" and "Checks & Balances".)
[/rant]
"It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."
-- Andrew Jackson

#7   willk

willk
  • Members
  • 406 posts

Posted 22 October 2002 - 12:48 PM

they started sueing one month after the organiztion was formed...?

whats wrong with this picture?

only little guys that can't fight back?

time to call guido and the godfather,eh?  make an offer they can't refuse...

#8   Shawn

Shawn
  • Members
  • 98 posts

Posted 23 October 2002 - 02:28 AM

Basically for those that didn't read the whole article;

This company [PanIP LLC ] was awarded 2 patents on E-Commerce techiques that are employed in every e-commerce website in the world! The lanuage of the patents are so vague that they literally apply to any website that sells anything.

PanIP LLC has begun a spree of lawsuits going after small to medium sized organizations. So far these people [from what I understand] have not lost a case yet and are gouging e-commerce websites, all becuase they sell stuff via the web.

I can only speculate that there intention is to sue little companies and reap the $$ all the while building up a precedents so that that will have a foot hold to go after folks like Amazon.com and Toys R Us.

What ever their battle plan is it scares the hell out of me! This is exactly the kind of thing that can RUIN a company and put people out of jobs! These jokers neither wrote the code nor developed the technology. They are free loading bastards that filed a patent on somthing that they did not create and are now on a financial war path to make themselve rich with out having to work for it and ruin companies like us.

Based upon the ridiculous nature of there claims I think I am going to file a patent on Rock & Roll music and then I am going to sue the Beatles for making music and selling it!

I would have a case after all... wouldn't I?

#9   ocularmagic

ocularmagic
  • Members
  • 187 posts

Posted 23 October 2002 - 07:39 PM

This guy has tried this before only on a larger scale.  In a different article, there was this

Quote

" Lockwood was involved in a famous patent case in 1991, when he sued
American Airlines for violating three patents he had obtained for an
automated travel-reservation system. Lockwood lost that case in U.S.
district court in San Diego, says Joseph Re, an attorney with Knobbe,
Martens, Olson & Bear LLP, who represented American Airlines, and then lost
on appeal in the Federal Circuit Court in Washington in 1997. The courts
invalidated two of his patents."
  Apparently he has a habit of getting vague patents and trying to sue for violations, but as in the previous case, he lost and got them revoked.  I wouldn't worry about it too much based on the previous outcome of the similair case.  Lockwood is the guy that sold the rights of the patents to PanIP, which only opened it's doors a few months ago and started suing right away.  Sounds like a scam to make quick money to me and I don't think it will last long in the courts.  Just my opinion though.